Skip to main content

Section 5.1 Parts of Speech

Most students first learn about parts of speech through definitions based on meaning. You’ve probably heard these:
These semantic definitionsβ€”definitions based on meaningβ€”are helpful starting points. They work well for many common words: β€œteacher” names a person (noun), β€œrun” expresses an action (verb), β€œtall” describes a quality (adjective), β€œquickly” tells how an action is performed (adverb).

The Limits of Semantic Definitions.

But semantic definitions run into trouble surprisingly often. Consider these challenges:
Is "destruction" a thing? The word β€œdestruction” is clearly a nounβ€”it follows β€œthe” (β€œthe destruction”), it can be plural (β€œdestructions”), and it has a noun suffix (-tion). Yet it doesn’t name a "thing" in any concrete sense. It names an action or event. Similarly, arrival, swimming, development, and happiness are all nouns, but none names a "person, place, or thing."
Is "know" an action? The verb β€œknow” doesn’t describe anything we actively doβ€”it describes a mental state. So do believe, own, resemble, and deserve. These are verbs, but calling them "action words" stretches the definition uncomfortably.
Where do function words fit? What "thing" does β€œthe” name? What action does β€œis” perform? Words like the, a, of, and very play grammatical roles that semantic definitions cannot easily capture.
The fundamental problem is that semantic definitions work backward: they assume we already know what the word means and then try to fit that meaning into a category. But meaning is slippery, and the same word can mean different things in different contexts.

A Better Approach: Form and Function.

In this course, we’ll use two more reliable methods for identifying parts of speech:
Morphological tests examine what forms a word can takeβ€”what endings or inflections it accepts. Nouns can be plural and possessive. Verbs can take past tense and -ing. Adjectives can be compared. These patterns are consistent regardless of meaning.
Syntactic tests examine how a word functions in sentencesβ€”where it can appear and what other words can accompany it. Nouns follow determiners like the. Verbs follow modals like can. Adjectives appear between the and a noun.
Together, these tests give us objective criteria for classification. Rather than asking "Does this word name a thing?" (which is debatable), we ask "Can this word be pluralized? Can it follow the?" (which we can test directly).

The Two Questions.

When analyzing any word in a sentence, you must ask two separate questions:
  1. What IS this word? (formβ€”its part of speech)
  2. What is this word DOING? (functionβ€”its grammatical role)
These questions have different answers, and both answers matter. This is the dual-identification principle, and it will guide your analysis throughout this course.

Form: What a Word IS.

Form refers to a word’s part of speechβ€”its inherent grammatical category. We determine form by examining the word’s morphological properties (what endings it can take) and its typical syntactic behavior.
For example, β€œhappy” is an adjective. How do we know? Because it passes the tests for adjectives:
These properties belong to the word itself, regardless of how it’s used in any particular sentence.

Function: What a Word DOES.

Function refers to the grammatical role a word plays in a specific sentence. The same word can perform different functions in different sentencesβ€”and sometimes a word’s function differs from what we’d expect based on its form.
Consider the word β€œpoor”:
β€œThe poor deserve our help.”
What is β€œpoor”? By form, it’s an adjective (it can be graded: poorer, poorest). But what is it doing in this sentence? It’s functioning as a nounβ€”it follows a determiner (the), it serves as the subject of the sentence, and it refers to a group of people. We call this an adjective functioning nominally (doing the job of a noun).

Form and Function Can Match or Differ.

Example 1: Form and function match
β€œShe spoke quietly.”
  • Form: quietly is an adverb (formed with -ly from adjective quiet)
  • Function: quietly functions adverbially (it modifies the verb spoke, telling us how she spoke)
Here form and function alignβ€”an adverb doing adverb work.
Example 2: Form and function differ
β€œThe coffee table needs dusting.”
  • Form: coffee is a noun (it can be pluralized: coffees; it can follow determiners: the coffee)
  • Function: coffee functions adjectivally (it modifies table, telling us what kind of table)
Here a noun is doing the work typically done by adjectives.
Example 3: Another mismatch
β€œShe runs fast.”
  • Form: fast is typically an adjective (a fast car, faster, fastest)
  • Function: fast functions adverbially (it modifies runs, telling us how she runs)

Why This Matters.

The form/function distinction matters for three reasons:
  1. Words are flexible.
    English allows words to shift between functions freely. Understanding this prevents you from making errors like "That can’t be an adjective because it’s modifying a verb."
  2. Labels depend on context.
    You cannot fully describe a word’s grammar without seeing it in a sentence. The word β€œwalk” is a verb in β€œI walk to school” but a noun in β€œThe walk was pleasant.”
  3. Complete analysis requires both.
    Saying β€œpoor” is an adjective in the sentence β€œThe poor deserve help” is incomplete. A full analysis recognizes both what the word is (adjective) and what it’s doing (functioning as a noun).
Throughout this chapter, we’ll examine four major word classes. For each one, you’ll learn both morphological tests (to identify form) and syntactic tests (to analyze function). Keep the dual-identification principle in mind: always identify both what a word is and what it’s doing.