Skip to main content

Section 11.3 Modal Meanings in Detail

The table in the previous section gave you a starting point, but modal meaning is genuinely more complex than any single-gloss summary can capture. Most modals are polysemousβ€”they carry multiple distinct but related meanings, and context determines which reading applies. This section works through each modal pair in detail. As you read, notice that the meanings within each pair often shade into each other: ability and possibility are closely related concepts, as are permission and possibility. The challengeβ€”and the interestβ€”of modal grammar is in distinguishing these readings precisely.

Can and Could.

Ability:
Possibility:
Permission:

Will and Would.

Future:
Willingness:
Hypothetical/Conditional:
Polite requests:
Past habit:

Shall and Should.

Shall (formal, mostly British):
Should (obligation, expectation):

May and Might.

Permission (may):
Possibility:

Must.

Necessity/Obligation:
Multi-level labeling table for "You must stop here"
Syntax tree for "You must stop here" showing must expressing obligation
[S [NP [PRON You]] [VP [MOD must] [V stop] [ADVP [ADV here]]]]
Logical conclusion:
Multi-level labeling table for "She must be tired"
Syntax tree for "She must be tired" showing must used for deduction, with a predicative adjective as complement
[S [NP [PRON She]] [VP [MOD must] [V be] [ADJP [ADJ tired]]]]
Notice that the same modal can express two very different things: You must rest (I am telling you to restβ€”obligation) versus You must be tired (I conclude that you are tiredβ€”deduction). Context always determines which reading applies. When must is followed by an action verb, it usually signals obligation. When it is followed by be or a stative expression, it usually signals a logical conclusion.