Skip to main content

Section 6.3 Pronouns

Pronouns replace noun phrases. They are the stand-in system of languageβ€”compact pointers that take the place of full descriptions. Instead of repeating a long or complex noun phrase every time we refer to an entity, we can substitute a short pronoun that listeners understand as referring to the same thing. This makes language dramatically more efficient, but it also requires listeners to track what each pronoun refers to.
Pronouns encode several kinds of relational information in a remarkably small package. They mark personβ€”distinguishing the speaker (I, we) from the addressee β€œyou” from everyone else (he, she, it, they). They mark numberβ€”singular versus plural. In the third person singular, they mark gender (he, she, it). And they mark caseβ€”whether the pronoun is functioning as a subject (I, she, they) or an object (me, her, them). A single pronoun like β€œher” simultaneously tells you: third person, singular, feminine, object case. That is a lot of grammatical information packed into one syllable.
Pronouns also serve a crucial role in connecting sentences to each other. When you read β€œThe professor entered the room. She placed her notes on the desk.”, the pronouns β€œshe” and β€œher” create cohesionβ€”they link the second sentence back to the first by referring to the same person. Without pronouns, every sentence would stand in isolation, and readers would have to re-identify every entity from scratch each time it was mentioned.
The tradeoff is that pronouns are efficient but potentially ambiguous. They require listeners to track referencesβ€”to remember who β€œshe” is, what β€œit” refers to, and which group β€œthey” picks out. When this tracking breaks down, communication fails. Ambiguous pronoun reference is one of the most common writing problems, and we will return to it later in this section.

Why Pronouns Exist.

Imagine language without pronouns:
Maria said that Maria wanted Maria’s book back, but John told Maria that John had already returned Maria’s book to Maria’s office.
Now with pronouns:
Maria said that she wanted her book back, but John told her that he had already returned it to her office.
Pronouns reduce redundancy and improve processing. The second version is not only shorter but easier to read and understand. The repeated proper nouns in the first version are distracting, and they actually make the sentence harder to process because the reader has to work to determine whether each instance of β€œMaria” refers to the same person or potentially different people. Pronouns, by contrast, signal continuity: they tell the reader that the same entity is still being discussed.

Pronouns Replace Entire Noun Phrases.

An important principle to understand is that pronouns do not just replace the head nounβ€”they replace the entire noun phrase, including all of its modifiers. When you substitute a pronoun for a noun phrase, the determiner, any adjectives, and any post-modifiers all disappear, collapsed into the single pronoun.
Consider the noun phrase β€œthe brilliant young student from Ohio”. This phrase contains a determiner β€œthe”, two adjectives (brilliant, young), a head noun β€œstudent”, and a prepositional phrase modifier β€œfrom Ohio”—six words in total. When we replace this NP with a pronoun, the entire six-word phrase becomes β€œshe”. The pronoun does not replace just β€œstudent”; it replaces the whole expression.
The following diagram pairs illustrate this principle. In each pair, the first diagram shows a full noun phrase with its internal structure, and the second shows how that entire structure collapses to a single pronoun.

Full NP: The tall student sleeps.

Multi-level labeling table for "The tall student sleeps"
Syntax tree for "The tall student sleeps" showing full NP with determiner, adjective, and noun
[S [NP [DET The] [ADJP [ADJ tall]] [N student]] [VP [V sleeps]]]

Pronoun replacement: She sleeps.

Multi-level labeling table for "She sleeps"
Syntax tree for "She sleeps" showing pronoun as complete NP
[S [NP [PRON She]] [VP [V sleeps]]]
Notice that the three-word noun phrase β€œthe tall student”—with its determiner, adjective phrase, and nounβ€”has been entirely replaced by the single pronoun β€œShe”. The NP node in the tree now contains only the pronoun.

Full NPs: The teacher gave the young student a book.

Multi-level labeling table for "The teacher gave the young student a book"
Syntax tree for "The teacher gave the young student a book" showing full NPs
[S [NP [DET The] [N teacher]] [VP [V gave] [NP [DET the] [ADJP [ADJ young]] [N student]] [NP [DET a] [N book]]]]

Pronoun replacement: She gave me a book.

Multi-level labeling table for "She gave me a book"
Syntax tree for "She gave me a book" showing pronouns replacing full NPs
[S [NP [PRON She]] [VP [V gave] [NP [PRON me]] [NP [DET a] [N book]]]]
In this pair, two of the three noun phrases have been replaced by pronouns. β€œThe teacher” becomes β€œShe”, and β€œthe young student” becomes β€œme”. The third NP, β€œa book”, retains its full form. This illustrates a common pattern: in real language, some NPs in a sentence are pronominalized while others are not, depending on which entities have already been introduced.
The same principle applies to complex noun phrases with post-modifiers:

Full NP: The old car on the corner.

Syntax tree for "The old car on the corner" showing complex NP with adjective and PP
[NP [DET The] [ADJP [ADJ old]] [N car] [PP [PREP on] [NP [DET the] [N corner]]]]

Pronoun replacement: it.

Syntax tree showing single pronoun "it" as complete NP
[NP [PRON it]]
Here the entire complex noun phraseβ€”determiner, adjective, head noun, and prepositional phrase modifierβ€”collapses to the single pronoun β€œit”. The pronoun stands in for all of that structure. This is why we say that pronouns replace noun phrases, not just nouns. Whether the original NP is two words or ten, the pronoun takes over the entire position.

Antecedents.

The noun phrase that a pronoun refers back to is called its antecedent. The word antecedent comes from Latin, meaning "going before"β€”and in most cases, the antecedent appears earlier in the text than the pronoun that refers to it. Identifying antecedents is crucial for understanding sentences correctly and for writing clearly.
In the following examples, the antecedent is in bold and the pronoun referring to it is in sans-serif:
In each of these sentences, the connection between the pronoun and its antecedent is clear. The reader has no trouble determining who β€œshe”, β€œhimself”, β€œtheir”, or β€œits” refers to because only one noun phrase in the sentence matches the pronoun’s features (person, number, gender).
However, ambiguous pronoun reference is one of the most common writing problems. It occurs when a pronoun could plausibly refer to more than one antecedent:
Who should leaveβ€”Maria or Sarah? Both are third-person singular feminine, so the pronoun β€œshe” could refer to either one. The reader is left guessing. In cases like this, the writer needs to restructure the sentence to eliminate the ambiguity: β€œMaria told Sarah, "You should leave"” or β€œMaria told Sarah, "I should leave."”
A good rule of thumb: whenever you use a pronoun, make sure the reader can identify the antecedent without hesitation. If there is any doubt, repeat the noun or rephrase the sentence.

Personal Pronouns.

Personal pronouns are the most common type. They vary for:
Person Number Gender Subject Object
First person Singular β€” I me
Second person Singular β€” you you
Third person Singular Masculine he him
Third person Singular Feminine she her
Third person Singular Neuter it it
First person Plural β€” we us
Second person Plural β€” you you
Third person Plural β€” they them
Pronouns also have possessive forms that function as determiners (my, your, his, her, its, our, their) or as standalone pronouns (mine, yours, his, hers, ours, theirs). These are discussed in section 6.2 under possessive determiners.

When the Same Word Is a Pronoun or a Determiner.

Several words can function as either a pronoun or a determiner depending on their position in the sentence. The key distinction is simple: if the word stands alone in place of a noun phrase, it is a pronoun. If it appears before a noun to introduce a noun phrase, it is a determiner.
Consider β€œher”:
  • I saw her. β€” her is a pronoun (it replaces an entire NP and stands alone as the object)
  • I read her book. β€” her is a determiner (it introduces the noun phrase her book, specifying whose book)
The same pattern applies to other possessive forms. When (his, my, your, our, its, their) appear before a noun, they function as determiners. Some of these also have standalone pronoun forms: (mine, yours, his, hers, ours, theirs).
Demonstratives show the same dual behavior:
  • This is interesting. β€” this is a pronoun (stands alone as the subject)
  • This book is interesting. β€” this is a determiner (introduces the NP this book)
The word class of these forms depends entirely on how they are used in a particular sentence, not on the word itself. Context determines category.
Case matters: Use subject forms for subjects, object forms for objects:
Singular "they": Increasingly accepted for indefinite reference and for people who don’t identify as he or she:

Reflexive Pronouns.

Reflexive pronouns end in β€œ-self” (singular) or β€œ-selves” (plural):
myself, yourself, himself, herself, itself, ourselves, yourselves, themselves
They are used when the object refers to the same entity as the subject:
Reflexives cannot be subjects and require an antecedent in the same clause:

Demonstrative Pronouns.

(This, that, these, those) can function as pronouns (standing alone) or determiners (with a noun):
As pronouns, demonstratives typically refer to things just mentioned, about to be mentioned, or physically present.

Interrogative Pronouns.

Question words that stand for unknown NPs:
Who vs. whom: Traditional grammar requires β€œwhom” as object β€œWhom did you see?”, but modern English often uses β€œwho” in all positions except after prepositions (To whom remains preferred over To who).

Indefinite Pronouns.

Pronouns that refer to unspecified entities:
Type Examples
Universal everyone, everybody, everything, all, each, both
Existential someone, somebody, something, some, any
Negative no one, nobody, nothing, none
Many indefinites are grammatically singular even when semantically plural: